The presidency of a country significantly shapes the customer experience for businesses and individuals, impacting areas such as economic policies, consumer protection, healthcare, and social services. A Harris presidency and a Trump presidency would create distinctly different experiences due to their divergent approaches to governance, policy priorities, and views on the role of government in regulating markets and protecting consumers. We explore the differences in customer experience that might arise from these two hypothetical administrations by examining economic policies, healthcare, consumer protection, the environment, and social equity.
Economic Policies
A core difference between a Kamala Harris presidency and a Donald Trump presidency would be their economic policies. Harris, being a Democrat, would likely prioritise progressive economic reforms to promote more significant equity and inclusivity. Her administration would likely focus on expanding opportunities for the middle and working classes and increasing regulations on big corporations to ensure fair wages and conditions for workers.
Under Harris's presidency, efforts to strengthen labour protections and improve wages might benefit the economic customer experience. For instance, Harris has been a vocal advocate for increasing the federal minimum wage, which directly impacts low-income consumers' purchasing power. More income would mean a remarkable ability to participate in the economy, leading to more retail, dining, and housing spending and creating a positive ripple effect.
Moreover, Harris could expand social safety nets, such as unemployment benefits and child tax credits, which would further improve the financial stability of lower-income Americans, creating a more resilient consumer base. Her administration would likely support infrastructure investments, which could enhance consumer experiences by improving public transportation, broadband access, and other public services that enhance quality of life.
On the other hand, Donald Trump's economic policies have been centred on deregulation, tax cuts, and a pro-business stance. His administration pushed for corporate tax cuts under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which he argued would lead to more significant business investments and job creation. From a customer experience perspective, a Trump presidency could lead to short-term gains for businesses, particularly in industries like energy, real estate, and manufacturing, where fewer regulations allow for faster growth and lower costs.
However, the benefits for consumers could be uneven. Trump's policies tend to favour the wealthy and large corporations, and while they may drive stock market growth, they do not necessarily trickle down to the average consumer. For example, the reduction in corporate taxes might not translate into wage increases or lower prices for consumers, as companies often reinvest savings in stock buybacks rather than passing them on to workers or consumers. Critics of Trump's economic policies argue that his approach exacerbates income inequality, which could result in a smaller, more financially constrained customer base.
Healthcare and Consumer Access
Another critical area where a Harris presidency and a Trump presidency would differ is healthcare policy, which directly influences the customer experience in accessing medical services and managing healthcare costs.
Harris, as a Democrat, would likely build on the Affordable Care Act (ACA), seeking to expand healthcare access and reduce consumer costs. During her 2020 presidential campaign, she advocated for "Medicare for All," a proposal that would have fundamentally transformed the healthcare landscape by creating a single-payer system. Although it is uncertain whether Harris would push for such sweeping reforms as president, she would undoubtedly prioritise expanding access to affordable healthcare, reducing prescription drug prices, and strengthening protections for individuals with pre-existing conditions.
This could result in lower healthcare costs, broader access to medical services, and reduced anxiety over unexpected medical expenses for consumers. Additionally, improved healthcare access might lead to healthier populations, increasing productivity and allowing consumers to spend more on goods and services outside of healthcare. A Harris presidency could also expand mental health services, women's healthcare, and preventive care, all of which would enhance the overall customer experience in the healthcare sector.
In contrast, Trump's presidency was marked by efforts to dismantle the ACA and reduce government involvement in healthcare. His administration sought to repeal the ACA, though it was ultimately unsuccessful. However, Trump did weaken specific law provisions, such as eliminating the individual mandate that required people to purchase insurance.
In a second Trump presidency, consumers might face fewer protections regarding pre-existing conditions, and the healthcare marketplace could become more fragmented, with fewer regulations on insurance providers. This could lead to more variability in the quality and cost of care and limited access to affordable insurance options for many Americans. Trump's approach could offer greater choice and flexibility for customers in higher-income brackets or those with employer-sponsored insurance. However, for lower-income and uninsured consumers, healthcare costs might rise, and access to care might become more complex, leading to a more inequitable experience across the population.
Consumer Protection and Regulation
A Harris presidency would likely emphasise consumer protection and advocate for stronger regulations to ensure businesses operate fairly and transparently. Harris has a background as a former Attorney General of California, where she fought for consumer rights and cracked down on fraud and exploitation in the financial and tech sectors. Under her presidency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) could be reinvigorated, holding businesses accountable for practices that harm consumers.
This would translate into a more protective and transparent market environment for consumers. Harris would likely push for stricter rules on financial institutions, enhancing protections against predatory lending practices and ensuring consumers have more transparent information about loans, credit cards, and mortgages. In sectors like technology, her administration might focus on data privacy to protect consumer data from being exploited or misused by large tech companies. In retail and online services, this could improve the trust and security of consumer transactions.
Conversely, Trump's administration was characterised by a rollback of regulations deemed too restrictive for businesses. To foster innovation and growth, he focused on deregulation across various sectors, including finance, energy, and telecommunications. For businesses, this translated into fewer compliance costs and greater freedom to operate without government interference.
However, for consumers, the customer experience in a Trump presidency could involve less oversight and fewer protections. Deregulation in industries like finance and telecommunications might expose customers to greater risks, such as misleading financial products or reduced internet neutrality protections. In terms of energy, fewer environmental regulations could lower energy costs for consumers in the short term, but at the potential expense of environmental degradation and health risks.
Environmental Policies and Sustainability
Environmental policy is another area where a Harris and a Trump presidency would create starkly different customer experiences. Harris advocates aggressive climate action, and her administration would likely prioritise renewable energy development, emissions reductions, and sustainability efforts. This could result in a customer experience focused on green products and services, from electric vehicles and solar panels to sustainable consumer goods.
Under a Harris presidency, businesses would face more pressure to adopt sustainable practices, which could drive innovation in eco-friendly products and services. For environmentally conscious consumers, this would improve access to sustainable options and create a sense of contributing to a broader societal goal of combating climate change.
In contrast, Trump has consistently favoured policies that promote fossil fuel production and reduce environmental regulations. His administration rolled back numerous ecological protections, arguing that they hindered economic growth. This could mean lower energy prices and greater access to traditional energy sources for consumers. However, it would also likely result in less focus on sustainability, and environmentally conscious consumers might feel that government policy does not support their preferences.
Social Equity and Inclusivity
Social equity and inclusivity are significant areas of divergence between Harris and Trump. As the first woman of colour to hold the office of Vice President, Harris has consistently championed social justice, racial equality, and gender equity. Her presidency would likely emphasise policies that promote inclusivity in the workforce, education, and broader society.
For consumers, this could manifest in greater access to opportunities for marginalised communities, improved media and advertising representation, and policies addressing systemic inequalities. A Harris presidency would likely foster a more inclusive marketplace, where businesses are encouraged to cater to diverse demographics and ensure equitable treatment for all customers.
On the other hand, Trump's presidency was marked by a focus on traditional values and less emphasis on diversity and inclusion. His rhetoric and policies, particularly around immigration and race relations, were polarising, leading to an environment where marginalised groups often felt excluded or targeted. This trend might continue in a second Trump presidency, potentially resulting in a more divided consumer base.
In conclusion, the customer experience under a Harris presidency versus a Trump presidency would differ dramatically across critical areas such as economic policy, healthcare, consumer protection, environmental sustainability, and social equity. Harris would likely foster a more equitable and protective environment for consumers. At the same time, Trump would prioritise deregulation and market-driven policies that could benefit businesses but might not directly translate into improved consumer experiences.
If your business would like help navigating customer experience in 2024, get in contact with us to discuss further: experience@yourcxc.com
Comments